Herb On Health
better healthcare and benefits
For Dimond Brothers

$8M to $20M in five years. Multiplied, not added.

How one hire compounds across the team Dimond is already building — for Dimond Brothers and BroadStreet Partners.

The Strategic Question

Why the math doesn't work by adding producers.

  • Tripling EB revenue won't come from tripling the producer count. Dimond's path runs on organic hires AND acquisitions — methodology compounds both.
  • Mid-market employers are buying methodology, not just producers. They want a fiduciary answer. Most producers don't have one.
  • BroadStreet's 30% benefits target requires replicable IP across the portfolio. A book of business doesn't compound. A framework does.

The 30-Second Answer

Herb. A partner, a methodology, a multiplier.

One hire that compounds — across producers, across teams, across the portfolio.

01

Partner

Personal production. Sweet spot 200–3,000 life self-funded. IMA $200K→$5.2M in eight years; $750K personally produced. The baseline 1x.

~15 yrsto develop
02

Methodology

The Employer Healthcare Governance framework. Replicable across the Dimond EB team. Exportable across the BroadStreet portfolio.

~4 yrsto build
03

Multiplier

P&C-producer uplift. AE coaching. New-producer onboarding. Lifts every team Dimond hires — and every team Dimond acquires. Designed to travel.

~8 yrsof pattern recognition

To add to the team

+1 producer

To multiply the team

×8

The team Dimond has today — and every team Dimond acquires tomorrow. Producers add. Methodology multiplies.

The Commitment

A target, two parts: personal production and measurable team uplift. If I miss either on my own steam, I walk.

Not a salary play. Not a solo book. Either we're multiplying or we're not — and we'll both know.

Continue the conversation